Town Hall Login
Password:
Login
Sign Up
Skip to content
About
Contact Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
The Soapbox
Board Home
All Boards
What's New
Search
More
Member List
NJHoo
Joined:
08/14/1998
Posts:
8007
Likes:
10908
What's this?
Exactly. Conclusions were directionally correct, but range of uncertainty
was off. Definitely not "Fake" science.
(
In response to
this post
by
Manbearpig
)
Posted: 11/15/2018 at 11:48AM
+0
Report Abuse
PREV
NEXT
REPLY
Insert a Link
Enter the title of the link here:
Enter the full web address of the link here
-- include the "http://" part
:
Cancel
OK
75
Hide This
Current Thread:
UVA not the only game in town fudging MMGW numbers
--
MasterRusty
11/15/2018 10:14AM
Why are you so anti-science?
--
ResistHoo
11/15/2018 3:35PM
Talking to yourself again? **
--
111Balz
11/15/2018 8:21PM
Nobody fudged anything and the basic finding still stands, that the oceans
--
111Balz
11/15/2018 12:53PM
Good science that once a mistake is noted, it is getting corrected. **
--
JohnHoo2
11/15/2018 11:16AM
Bad science to keep publishing fake statistics. **
--
MasterRusty
11/15/2018 1:17PM
They aren't fake statistics, they were inappropriate
--
Manbearpig
11/15/2018 1:40PM
Doesn't say much for the reviewers though **
--
Faz d. Hoo
11/15/2018 11:42AM
They did poor statistical analysis
--
Manbearpig
11/15/2018 10:50AM
Exactly. Conclusions were directionally correct, but range of uncertainty
--
NJHoo
11/15/2018 11:48AM
This is why it's indefensible for scientists to withhold data from public **
--
Sabremetrician
11/15/2018 11:34AM
So I can't use my jump to conclusions mat? **
--
FfxStationHokie
11/15/2018 10:52AM
Of course you can! I hear it's snowing up your way. It's Nov 15th!
--
Hoodafan
11/15/2018 11:01AM
Snowed in Louisiana yesterday...perhaps earliest ever **
--
Tuckahokie
11/15/2018 11:04AM
Dude. **
--
Shenhoo
11/15/2018 11:15AM
Sweet! **
--
MasterRusty
11/15/2018 1:14PM
Ok **
--
Manbearpig
11/15/2018 11:08AM
Seems like it was an honest mistake and was corrected. But the conclusion
--
THECZAR
11/15/2018 10:38AM
Absolutely, but deniers will point to this anyway and use it as an excuse
--
81_Hokie
11/15/2018 10:57AM
Because this isn't even a scientific issue. It's a political issue.
--
hoolstoptheheels
11/15/2018 3:16PM
Princeton, scripts, UVA, Penn State, East Anglia U, all published bad data
--
ConnHoo
11/15/2018 9:27PM
You cannot equivocate the two sides on this issue
--
Manbearpig
11/15/2018 8:32PM
Because it's tribal. They are not considered good repubs if they buy into
--
hoolstoptheheels
11/15/2018 9:04PM
Trumpies can't do next level analyses **
--
HptHokie
11/15/2018 10:54AM
You must log in before you can reply to this message.
Please
login
if you wish to reply.
Notice
: Trying to get property 'queue' of non-object in
/data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php
on line
2781
Warning
: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in
/data/www/sportswar.com/wp-includes/script-loader.php
on line
2781
About
Contact Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy